<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>DataStax Support Forums &#187; User Favorites: tbroadbent</title>
		<link><a href='http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/profile/tbroadbent'>tbroadbent</a></link>
		<description>Software, Support, and Training for Apache Cassandra</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.3</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/rss/profile/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>tbroadbent on "Cassandra 1.2 JBOD and Raid"</title>
			<link>http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/topic/cassandra-12-jbod-and-raid#post-8976</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 06:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>tbroadbent</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8976@http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;With the introduction of JBOD support in Cassandra 1.2, is RAID 0/10 still the preferred setup? &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;It seems that a RAID0 setup may still offer improved read/write performance over JBOD but with the risk of losing the entire node if a disk fails. This isn't a huge issue with R&#38;gt;2 and a large number of nodes. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;If a disk fails using JBOD, Cassandra flags the disk, distributes the data to other working nodes, and when the disk is replaced Cassandra would assign new data? (thinking hot swappable drives)
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
