<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>DataStax Support Forums &#187; Topic: Diskless nodes?</title>
		<link>http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/topic/diskless-nodes</link>
		<description>Software, Support, and Training for Apache Cassandra</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 19:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.3</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/rss/topic/diskless-nodes" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>ethrbunny on "Diskless nodes?"</title>
			<link>http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/topic/diskless-nodes#post-8457</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 16:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>ethrbunny</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">8457@http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;(bear with me) I'm wondering about the feasibility of using diskless nodes in a cluster. Assume that each node is PXE booted, has bonded 10G NICs and gets / puts data into a DFS. Nodes would be maxed out on RAM to reduce swapping. &#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Seems like this would have the advantages of:&#60;br /&#62;
1) less power consumption&#60;br /&#62;
2) easy to replace failed nodes&#60;br /&#62;
3) easy to add new nodes / grow array&#60;br /&#62;
4) lower cost / node&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Disadvantages:&#60;br /&#62;
1) slower disk IO speed&#60;br /&#62;
2) ??&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;What *huge* *horrible* *are you crazy* things am I missing?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
