<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>DataStax Support Forums &#187; Topic: Performance of Cassandra with multiple secondary indexes</title>
		<link>http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/topic/performance-of-cassandra-with-multiple-secondary-indexes</link>
		<description>Software, Support, and Training for Apache Cassandra</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.3</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/rss/topic/performance-of-cassandra-with-multiple-secondary-indexes" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>xedin on "Performance of Cassandra with multiple secondary indexes"</title>
			<link>http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/topic/performance-of-cassandra-with-multiple-secondary-indexes#post-6600</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>xedin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6600@http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;The only option I see would be to try to build a composite column of those 6 and query it instead of secondary indices, this should be a good start &#60;a href=&#34;http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/introduction-to-composite-columns-part-1&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/introduction-to-composite-columns-part-1&#60;/a&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>rprvnreddy on "Performance of Cassandra with multiple secondary indexes"</title>
			<link>http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/topic/performance-of-cassandra-with-multiple-secondary-indexes#post-6599</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>rprvnreddy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">6599@http://www.datastax.com/support-forums/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;We are asking this for guidance on high performing schema design with secondary indexes for reads. We have 7 columns in a column family. Our queries need to retrieve rows by setting where clause for 6 of the columns. Due to this reason we are adding secondary indexes for these 6 columns. We are noticing that as we increase the &#34;where&#34; clauses in cassandra-cli client the performance degrades. We checked this behavior with &#34;Astyanax&#34; java client.&#60;br /&#62;
    Can you please suggest how we go about increasing the read performance.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
